Assertion (A) and Reason (R).
Assertion (A): No cat is a dog.
Reason (R): Some dogs are pets.
Choose the correct option:
The correct option is: Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is NOT the correct explanation of (A)
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11343
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
Assertion (A) and Reason (R).
Assertion (A): All squares are rectangles.
Reason (R): All rectangles have four right angles.
Choose the correct option:
The correct option is: Both (A) and (R) are true, but (R) is NOT the correct explanation of (A)
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11342
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
Consider the following statement:
Statements:
All fruits are sweet. All apples are fruits.
Conclusion:
All apples are sweet.
True
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11341
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
Two trains of lengths 120 m and 180 m are moving in opposite directions at 54 km/h and 72 km/h respectively. How long will they take to cross each other?
When two trains cross each other completely, the total distance they need to cover is equal to the sum of their individual lengths.
Length of Train 1 ($L_1$) = $120 \text{ m}$
Length of Train 2 ($L_2$) = $180 \text{ m}$
$$\text{Total Distance} = L_1 + L_2 = 120 + 180 = 300 \text{ m}$$
Since the two trains are moving in opposite directions, their speeds are added up to find the relative speed.
Speed of Train 1 = $54 \text{ km/h}$
Speed of Train 2 = $72 \text{ km/h}$
$$\text{Relative Speed} = 54 + 72 = 126 \text{ km/h}$$
Since the distance is in metres, we need the speed to be in $\text{m/s}$. To convert $\text{km/h}$ to $\text{m/s}$, multiply by $\frac{5}{18}$:
$$\text{Relative Speed in m/s} = 126 \times \frac{5}{18}$$
$$\text{Relative Speed in m/s} = 7 \times 5 = 35 \text{ m/s}$$
Using the time, speed, and distance formula:
$$\text{Time} = \frac{\text{Total Distance}}{\text{Relative Speed}}$$
$$\text{Time} = \frac{300}{35} = \frac{60}{7} \text{ seconds}$$
$$\text{Time} \approx 8.57 \text{ seconds} \text{ (or } 8\frac{4}{7} \text{ seconds)}$$
The two trains will take $8.57$ seconds (or $\frac{60}{7}$ seconds) to completely cross each other.
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11340
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
If a man increases his speed by 25%, he takes 1 hour less to cover a certain distance. What was the original time?
Since the distance remains constant, speed and time are inversely proportional to each other ($\text{Speed} \propto \frac{1}{\text{Time}}$).
Find the Speed Ratio:
An increase of $25\%$ means if the original speed was $100\%$, the new speed is $125\%$.
$$\text{Ratio of Speed (Original : New)} = 100 : 125 = 4 : 5$$
Find the Time Ratio:
Since time is inversely proportional to speed, we flip the ratio:
$$\text{Ratio of Time (Original : New)} = 5 : 4$$
Calculate the Original Time:
The difference between the original time and the new time in the ratio is $5 - 4 = 1 \text{ unit}$.
According to the question, this $1 \text{ unit}$ difference is equal to $1 \text{ hour}$.
$$\text{Original Time} = 5 \text{ units} = 5 \times 1 \text{ hour} = \mathbf{5 \text{ hours}}$$
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11339
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
A car covers a distance at 50 km/h and returns at 40 km/h. What is the average speed for the whole journey?
Substitute the values into the formula:
$$\text{Average Speed} = \frac{2 \times 50 \times 40}{50 + 40}$$
Simplify the numerator and denominator:
$$\text{Average Speed} = \frac{4000}{90}$$
Calculate the final value:
$$\text{Average Speed} = \frac{400}{9} \approx 44.44 \text{ km/h}$$
The average speed for the whole journey is $44.44 \text{ km/h}$ (or $44\frac{4}{9} \text{ km/h}$).
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11338
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
Consider the following statement:
Statement:
All teachers are educated.
Conclusion:
Some educated people are teachers.
True
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11337
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
Consider the following statement:
Statement:
"There has been a sharp increase in online education platforms."
Possible Causes:
I. Affordable internet availability
II. Increased demand for flexible learning
Choose the correct option :
The correct option is that Both I and II are possible causes for the sharp increase in online education platforms.
Here is the breakdown of why both statements act as immediate and valid causes:
Cause I (Affordable internet availability): This provides the necessary technological infrastructure. Without cheap and widespread internet access, the general public would not be able to stream lectures or access digital course materials, meaning platforms could not grow on a large scale.
Cause II (Increased demand for flexible learning): This provides the market demand. Working professionals, students in remote areas, and individuals looking to upskill require learning options that fit their own schedules, driving the growth of these platforms.
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11336
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
Introducing a woman, Raj said," She is the wife of the only son of my mother-in-law." How is the woman related to Raj?
"My mother-in-law": This refers to the mother of Raj's wife.
"The only son of my mother-in-law": The only son of Raj's mother-in-law would be his wife's brother (Raj's brother-in-law).
"She is the wife of [this only son]": The wife of Raj's brother-in-law is Raj's sister-in-law (specifically, his wife's brother's wife).
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11335
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
If A+B means A is the mother of B, A-B means A is the brother of B, A x B means A is the father of B, what does P - Q x R+S mean?
$P - Q$ * According to "$A - B$", this means $P$ is the brother of $Q$.
(So, $P$ is male and they belong to the same generation).
$Q \times R$ * According to "$A \times B$", this means $Q$ is the father of $R$.
(So, $Q$ is male and belongs to the generation above $R$).
$R + S$ * According to "$A + B$", this means $R$ is the mother of $S$.
(So, $R$ is female and belongs to the generation above $S$).
$P$ and $Q$ are brothers.
$Q$ has a child named $R$ (specifically, $R$ is $Q$'s daughter because $R$ is the mother of $S$).
Since $P$ is the brother of $R$'s father ($Q$), $P$ is the paternal uncle of $R$.
$R$ has a child named $S$, making $Q$ the grandfather and $P$ the paternal grand-uncle of $S$.
The expression $P - Q \times R + S$ establishes the following primary relationships:
$P$ is the paternal uncle of $R$ (Father's brother).
$P$ is the paternal grand-uncle of $S$.
$R$ is the niece of $P$.
Describe the issue with this question. Our team will review it.
Question ID: 11334
Message must be at least 5 characters.
Message must not exceed 2000 characters.
Login to view more questions
Login to Continue